As Enevo's staff accountant, I wanted to weigh in on Geoff Aardsma's, article that ran in both Fast Casual Magazine and QSRweb. What are the top five takeaways for bottom line savings when looking at your trash? Cost savings, better waste services, and the value of dumpster diving!
Is there a correct answer? Of course. However, there are some important considerations when embarking on a container fullness study:
A tour of the floor at Waste Expo this year showed a clear trend in the variety of new technologies available to the waste industry.
As we reflect on 2015 and plan for 2016, many look to understand the pressures that affected their year. While there were a wide variety of topics affecting the waste industry this year (see economics of recycling, ongoing commitments to CNG investments in the face of lower diesel rates, and exciting momentum toward reducing food waste), I wanted to write about a lesser publicized issue – illegal dumping.
Enevo began 5 years ago on the premise that technological advances could have a transformational impact on how we manage waste. Today this is a reality!
The CABA blog post last December, “Small Business Needs to Engage in Paris and Beyond” stated a clear call to action for small businesses to join the efforts toward reducing their impact climate change. However, the achievement of sustainability goals can sometimes seem overwhelming to small companies – there are drastic measures that need to be taken in order to reach the goals set in Paris at COP21.
Across the globe, presently we face a range of competing and conflicting challenges. Many of these could in some respects also be described as a series of “black swan” moments. The term “black swan” was coined by Nassem Taleb to describe events that come as a surprise and have a major impact but are also often rationalized after the fact to hindsight.